Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether slub yarn manufactured by using a special electronic device was classifiable under Heading 5506 or under Heading 5606 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the yarn was manufactured from polyester and viscose fibres with special mechanical stimulation through an electronic device, which created thick and thin features and imparted the slub effect during spinning. On that basis, the yarn was not treated as a normal yarn but as a special yarn. The classification adopted by Revenue under Heading 5606 was therefore found to be correct and the contrary claim for Heading 5506 was not accepted.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 5606 was upheld and the appeal was rejected.