Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on GTA service used for outward transportation of final products to buyers' premises for the period prior to 1.4.2008.
Analysis: The definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as it stood before amendment on 1.4.2008, covered transportation from the place of removal. The dispute period being prior to that amendment, and the higher court having upheld the view that transportation from the factory to the buyers' premises fell within that expression, the assessee was entitled to the benefit.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit on the GTA service was admissible to the assessee for the relevant period, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For periods prior to 1.4.2008, outward transportation of final products from the factory to the buyers' premises falls within the scope of input service when covered by the expression from the place of removal.