Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning differential duty on goods cleared for home consumption after return from export.
Analysis: The applicant's case was that the export consignment was rejected, the goods were returned to the factory, reprocessed, and thereafter part of the goods were exported while the balance was cleared for home consumption on payment of duty on the transaction value applicable to such domestic clearances. The Revenue invoked Rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the ground of non-compliance with the procedure for bringing the goods back to the factory. The Tribunal accepted the applicant's contention that each assessment is separate and that duty had been discharged on the goods cleared for home consumption, which was sufficient at the prima facie stage.
Conclusion: The applicant was held to have made out a prima facie case, and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived with recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal.