Pre-deposit waiver denied on lack of product similarity and prima facie suppression in an exemption dispute.

Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the exported Bearing Housing Assembly and the domestic Turbine Wheels were found to have different characteristics, different functions and no commercial interchangeability, despite both being used in turbo chargers. The appellants also failed to show any similarity beyond that common component description. On limitation, the department's allegation of suppression regarding use of imported and indigenous raw materials was found prima facie sustainable. As no separate financial hardship was demonstrated, complete waiver was declined and a partial pre-deposit was required, with the balance stayed subject to compliance.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit, and whether the goods exported and the goods cleared in the domestic tariff area could be treated as similar for the purpose of the exemption notification.

Analysis: The goods exported, namely Bearing Housing Assembly, were found prima facie not similar to the goods cleared in the domestic tariff area, namely Turbine Wheels, since they had different characteristics, different functions and were not commercially interchangeable. The appellants had also not demonstrated the alleged similarity beyond stating that both items were components of turbo chargers. On the issue of limitation, the department's plea of suppression regarding use of imported and indigenous raw materials was also found prima facie sustainable. No financial hardship was shown apart from the merits of the case.

Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the duty amount, while waiver of the balance and stay of recovery were granted subject to compliance.

---