Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances of aluminium pipes to an SEZ developer without payment of duty were covered by Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and whether the demand, interest and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the applicability of Rule 6(6) to supplies made to an SEZ developer during the relevant period. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been settled in favour of such clearances by prior decisions, and that the amendment brought in December 2008 was retrospective in operation. On that basis, the supplies to the SEZ developer were treated as valid clearances without duty, and the foundation for the demand, interest and penalty fell away.
Conclusion: The demand, interest and penalty were unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded.