Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in relation to removal of residual fuel gas to a sister unit for generation of electricity and steam.
Analysis: The demand arose from removal of residual fuel gas generated during cracking of naphtha to another unit in the same factory premises for conversion into electricity and steam, which were then used in the manufacture of final products. The Tribunal noted that in the appellant's own earlier case, on materially similar facts involving partially processed naphtha sent for the same purpose, it had been held that duty was not payable and that the assessee was entitled to follow the procedure under the relevant excise and CENVAT credit rules. The Tribunal found the present case to be substantially on the same lines and also noted the appellant's contention that the relevant facts had already been disclosed to the Department, making invocation of extended limitation and penalty untenable at this stage.
Conclusion: The appellant had established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed during pendency of the appeal.