Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning availing of proportionate CENVAT credit while clearing final products under Notification No. 29/2004-C.E. and Notification No. 30/2004-C.E.
Analysis: The circular relied upon by the applicant was treated as clarificatory and as recognising the practical difficulty faced by textile manufacturers using common inputs in continuous manufacture. The circular permitted proportionate credit to be taken at the end of the month for goods cleared on payment of duty, subject to record support. On that basis, and in the absence of any dispute on quantum, the applicant was found to have a strong prima facie case. The objection that the circular was prospective did not displace the entitlement to interim relief in the facts considered.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.