Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sufficient cause existed for extending the period for issuance of show-cause notice under the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The extension was sought on the ground that investigation could not be completed because the appellant did not cooperate, the seized computer data could not be retrieved, and the source of the seized goods and cash was not explained. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had recorded satisfaction on these grounds and that the appellant had not rebutted the basis for further investigation. The Tribunal also noted that the unexplained seizure material supported the need for continued inquiry.
Conclusion: The extension of time for issuance of the show-cause notice was upheld and the challenge to the impugned order failed.