Conflicting interpretations on currency smuggling laws referred to Larger Bench for resolution

The court referred the case to a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting interpretations on absolute confiscation versus redemption of Indian currency smuggled outside India without RBI permission, exceeding Rs.5000. The appellant contested the seizure and penalty imposed for undeclared currency at the airport, citing a procedural lapse in a similar case where a reduction in penalty was granted. The judge deemed it necessary for clarity and consistency in such cases, directing the matter to the Hon'ble President for the formation of a Larger Bench to address the conflicting precedents and establish a uniform legal position.

---

---

Issues:
- Appeal against seizure and absolute confiscation of Indian currency
- Imposition of penalty on the appellant
- Interpretation of conflicting decisions regarding absolute confiscation

Analysis:
1. The appellant challenged the impugned order that seized and absolutely confiscated Indian currency smuggled outside India, with a penalty of Rs.2 lakhs imposed. The appellant was found with undeclared currency at the airport, leading to the initiation of proceedings resulting in the confiscation and penalty. The appellant contested the order seeking redemption of the currency based on a procedural lapse in a similar case.

2. The appellant's counsel cited a case where a significant amount of Indian currency was illegally exported, resulting in a reduction of redemption fine and penalty due to a procedural lapse. On the contrary, the respondent's representative referred to another case where absolute confiscation of Indian currency was upheld for illegal export, indicating a conflicting precedent on the matter.

3. Considering the contradictory decisions presented, the judge found it necessary in the interest of justice to refer the issue to a Larger Bench for clarification. The main question raised was whether absolute confiscation is appropriate when an individual attempts to export Indian currency without RBI permission exceeding Rs.5000, or if redemption through fines and penalties is a viable alternative.

4. The judge directed the registry to forward the case to the Hon'ble President for the formation of a Larger Bench to resolve the conflicting interpretations and provide clarity on the issue of absolute confiscation versus redemption of Indian currency in such cases. The decision to refer the matter aims to establish a consistent legal position for future cases involving similar circumstances.

---