Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit in a matter involving denial of Cenvat credit under Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The demand arose from credit taken in respect of service tax paid on contract amounts where part of the consideration was retained for final settlement. The appellant relied on the departmental circular to contend that the tax had been paid by the service providers. On the available facts, the Tribunal found that the Revenue had not made out a case of revenue loss and that the appellant had shown a case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and the stay petition was allowed.