TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal Upholds Compliance: Deposit Required for Service Tax Appeal Progress</h1> <h3>M/s Tarachandra Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE Vadodara-I</h3> M/s Tarachandra Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE Vadodara-I - TMI Issues:1. Stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit of confirmed amounts involving Service Tax liability for specific services.2. Appeal disposal without consideration of merits and limitation by the first appellate authority.3. Need for further deposit by the appellant for hearing and disposal of the appeal.Issue 1: Stay petition for waiver of pre-depositThe appellant filed a Stay Petition seeking the waiver of pre-deposit of confirmed amounts related to Service Tax liability for services provided under various categories. The adjudicating authority confirmed the amounts for the period between October 2005 to September 2010. The appellate authority upheld the amounts but dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order.Issue 2: Appeal disposal without consideration of merits and limitationThe first appellate authority directed the appellant to deposit the entire amount of Service Tax liability, interest, and penalty to hear and dispose of the appeal. The appellant argued that the Service Tax liability for the sub-contractor did not arise before 23.08.2007, citing settled law and various judgments. The appellant contended that the first appellate authority did not consider the merits of the case or the issue of limitation before ordering the pre-deposit.Issue 3: Need for further deposit by the appellantThe Tribunal noted that the issue was narrow, and they could not delve into the merits due to the absence of findings by the first appellate authority on the merits or limitation. The Tribunal acknowledged the settled law regarding Service Tax liability for sub-contractors before 23.08.2007 but highlighted differing views post that date. Considering the appellant had already deposited Rs.10 lakhs, the Tribunal directed an additional deposit of Rs.5 lakhs within eight weeks for the appeal's hearing and disposal by the first appellate authority, emphasizing compliance and the principles of natural justice.In summary, the judgment addressed the Stay Petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of confirmed amounts related to Service Tax liability for specific services. It highlighted the first appellate authority's failure to consider the merits and limitation before ordering the pre-deposit, leading to the need for further deposit by the appellant to proceed with the appeal's hearing and disposal. The Tribunal provided a detailed analysis of the legal aspects and directed the appellant to comply with the additional deposit requirement within a specified timeframe for the appeal's restoration and disposal on merit.
TaxTMI 