TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court remands case to tribunal for unclear predeposit requirements, quashes Rs. 45 lakh demand. Invalid rectification order.</h1> <h3>Astha Exim Versus Union of India & 2</h3> Astha Exim Versus Union of India & 2 - TMI Issues: Challenge to CESTAT order and rectification application regarding predeposit waiverIn this case, the petitioner challenged an order passed by the CESTAT on 24.10.2013, along with a subsequent order on 7.1.2014 regarding a rectification application. The main issue revolves around the condition of predeposit. The petitioner, an appellant before the tribunal, contested an order by the Commissioner confirming significant amounts of duty, interest, and penalty demands. The petitioner argued that the joint confirmation of these amounts against three individuals, including themselves, was impermissible. While the appeal was pending, the petitioner sought a waiver of predeposit. Other individuals facing similar confirmations also appealed and requested predeposit waivers. Notably, one of the jointly liable persons had already deposited Rs. 50 lakhs, leading the tribunal to consider this as sufficient predeposit. The tribunal then directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 45 lakhs, while requiring two other entities to deposit Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 50,000 each. Predeposit was entirely waived for the remaining appellants.The petitioner subsequently filed a rectification application, which was dismissed, prompting the current petition. Upon reviewing the tribunal's order, the High Court noted the lack of reasons for the varying predeposit requirements among different entities. The tribunal's decision to ask the petitioner for Rs. 45 lakhs while exempting others from any deposit lacked clarity and justification. Consequently, the High Court decided to remand the proceedings back to the tribunal for fresh consideration and disposal in accordance with the law. The part of the order requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs. 45 lakhs as predeposit was quashed.As a result, the order on the rectification application from 7.1.2014 was deemed invalid. The tribunal was instructed to reconsider the petitioner's application for predeposit waiver and issue a new order promptly and lawfully. The case was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 