Assessment proceedings continue under old Act despite new law; petitioner can seek remedies under new Act

The Court held that upon the repeal and reenactment of the U.P. Trade Tax Act with the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, the old provisions remained in force unless expressly stated otherwise. As such, the assessment proceedings initiated under the old Act had to be continued despite the enactment of the new law. The Court also emphasized that the petitioner could seek remedies under the new Act, specifically through the appeal process under Section 55 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy under the new legislation.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act for the year 2005-06, Reopening of assessment under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, Repeal of the U.P. Trade Tax Act and enactment of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, Applicability of Section 81 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, Interpretation of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 in light of the repeal and reenactment of laws, Availability of alternative remedy under Section 55 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008.

Analysis:

The petitioner, a registered dealer, was assessed under the U.P. Trade Tax Act for the year 2005-06. Subsequently, a notice was issued under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, seeking explanation for an undisclosed amount received from a project manager. The Addl. Commissioner granted permission to reassess the petitioner for the said year. The petitioner argued that since the U.P. Trade Tax Act was repealed and replaced by the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, no action initiated post the new Act's enforcement could continue. However, the Standing Counsel contended that the repeal saved acquired rights and liabilities under the old Act, citing Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and referred to relevant case law (Gammon India Ltd. v. Special Chief Secretary & Ors., 2006) to support this stance.

The Court analyzed the effect of repeal under Section 6 of the General Clauses Act and the principles laid down in the case law cited. It held that when a law is repealed and simultaneously reenacted, the reenactment reaffirms the old provisions unless explicitly stated otherwise. In this case, the assessment under the old Act had to be reopened based on new information, and the proceedings had to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the old Act, as saved by the repeal clause in the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008.

Regarding the availability of an alternative remedy, the Court noted that the petitioner could appeal under Section 55 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, despite the repeal of the old Act. It emphasized that the powers of appeal authorities and the petitioner's rights to pursue remedies remained intact under the new Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds of the availability of an alternative remedy through the appeal process under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008.

---