Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed paper boards used as wrappers are classifiable under SH 4901.90 as products of the printing industry or under SH 4823.90.
Analysis: The goods were printed paper boards used as wrappers. Classification turned on whether the printing activity was merely incidental to the primary use of the goods or whether it was an essential feature giving the goods their character as products of the printing industry. The Tribunal followed its earlier final order in similar matters and applied the relevant tariff entries and Note 2 to Section XI of the CETA Schedule. On the facts, the printing was found to be essential rather than incidental.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under SH 4901.90 as products of the printing industry and not under SH 4823.90.
Final Conclusion: The department's challenge to the classification failed and the lower appellate authority's view was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where printing is essential to the identity of the goods, and not merely incidental to their use, the goods are classifiable as products of the printing industry.