1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals Dismissed for Lack of Tribunal Authority - Seek Speaking Order</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai dismissed the appeals against Order-in-Appeal No. 635 to 647 dated 15.7.2013. The Tribunal held that it lacks ... Non passing of speaking order - Inspite of direction of Lower appellate authority adjudicating authority did not pass any speaking order - Held that:- there is no fault in lower appellate authority directing the adjudicating authority to pass a speaking order with regard to denial of benefit of exemption claimed by the appellant in Bills of Entry. If the adjudicating authority has not followed this direction, the remedy lies in taking up the matter with the jurisdictional Executive Commissioner. This Tribunal being an appellate authority does not have authority to control the functioning of the customs officer in a particular commissionerate - appeals are not maintainable - Decided against assessee. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai dismissed the appeals against Order-in-Appeal No. 635 to 647 dated 15.7.2013. The lower appellate authority directed M/s I G International Pvt. Ltd. to approach the adjudicating authority for a speaking order as per Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal stated that it does not have the authority to control the customs officer's functioning and the appeals were dismissed.