Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee-firm was entitled to registration under section 184(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the partnership deed provided fixed sums to the junior partners instead of a stated proportion of profits.
Analysis: Registration of a firm requires an instrument evidencing the partnership and specification of the individual shares of the partners. The Revenue's objection was that the junior partners were to receive fixed amounts, and therefore their shares were not specified in proportionate terms. The clause in question, however, expressly dealt with division of net profits and fixed the junior partners' shares in those profits at stated amounts. The requirement is that the shares must be specified, not that they must necessarily be expressed as proportional fractions. The arrangement was consistent with the principle that partners may agree to share profits in any manner they choose, including by fixed sums in lieu of variable profit participation.
Conclusion: The firm satisfied the statutory requirement and was entitled to registration; the question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For registration of a firm, the individual shares of partners are sufficiently specified if the partnership deed clearly fixes each partner's entitlement to profits, even where that entitlement is stated as a fixed sum rather than as a proportional fraction.