ITAT dismisses Revenue's appeal, partly allows assessee's claim. Mould expenses deleted, provision for obsolete stock upheld.

The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and partly allowed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the deletion of mould expenses, allowed the provision written back towards obsolete stock, and disallowed the provision for obsolete stock and the excise duty and interest paid on behalf of contract manufacturers.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition out of mould expenses.
2. Allowance of provision written back towards obsolete stock.
3. Disallowance of provision for obsolete stock.
4. Disallowance of excise duty and interest paid on behalf of contract manufacturers.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition Out of Mould Expenses:
The Revenue contended that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of mould expenses, arguing that these expenses were related to M/s Dart India & ITL and not the assessee company. The assessee, a wholly owned subsidiary of M/s Tupperware Asia Pacific Holdings Private Limited, claimed mould expenses of Rs. 46,632,929/- for the assessment year 2006-07. The AO disallowed these expenses, suggesting they were a colorable device to reduce tax liabilities, citing the McDowell principle. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the expenses under section 37 of the I.T. Act, noting that the assessee had a contractual obligation to bear these costs. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the rule of consistency and noting that similar expenses had been allowed in previous years without disallowance.

2. Allowance of Provision Written Back Towards Obsolete Stock:
For the assessment year 2008-09, the Revenue challenged the Ld. CIT(A)'s direction to allow the provision written back of Rs. 65,11,174/- for AY 2005-06 and Rs. 72,77,736/- for AY 2006-07 after verification. The assessee argued that these provisions, disallowed in earlier years, should not be taxed again. The Ld. CIT(A) directed the AO to verify the claims and allow the deductions, provided the assessee undertook not to press related grounds in pending appeals. The ITAT found no infirmity in this direction and upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s order.

3. Disallowance of Provision for Obsolete Stock:
The assessee appealed against the disallowance of a provision for obsolete stock amounting to Rs. 7,277,736/-. The AO had added this provision to the income, and the Ld. CIT(A) upheld this decision. However, the ITAT noted that for AY 2005-06, the Tribunal had decided a similar issue in favor of the assessee, acknowledging the consistent accounting policy of valuing inventory at cost or realizable value, whichever is lower. Following this precedent, the ITAT set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided in favor of the assessee.

4. Disallowance of Excise Duty and Interest Paid on Behalf of Contract Manufacturers:
The assessee claimed Rs. 49,409,120/- as a liability of Dart India and ITL for excise duty and interest, which it paid as a contractual obligation. The AO disallowed this, stating that the contract manufacturers were liable for these taxes, not the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) affirmed this view, and the ITAT agreed, noting that the contract clearly stipulated that the manufacturers were responsible for all taxes. The ITAT also observed that the liability pertained to earlier years, making the current year's claim unjustified. The ITAT upheld the disallowance, rejecting the argument of commercial expediency as unsubstantiated.

Conclusion:
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and partly allowed the assessee's appeal, upholding the deletion of mould expenses, allowing the provision written back, and disallowing the provision for obsolete stock and the excise duty and interest paid on behalf of contract manufacturers.

---