Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery in respect of demand of Cenvat credit, rebate, interest and penalty.
Analysis: The order records that the duty had been paid in the prescribed manner, including payment through Cenvat credit and cash, and that there was no procedural lapse in claiming rebate. The denial of credit was based only on the contention that the appellant was not a manufacturer, while the order noted that the duty payment had resulted in a revenue neutral situation. It further noted that precedent had taken the view that rebate may be admissible even where duty was not otherwise payable if duty had in fact been paid. On that basis, the appellants were found to have a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of dues was waived and recovery stayed during pendency of the appeals, in favour of the appellants.