Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the valuation of job-worked goods cleared to a principal manufacturer, Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2007 was prima facie applicable so as to justify the demand and deny waiver of pre-deposit.
Analysis: The finished goods were manufactured by a job worker from raw material supplied by the principal manufacturer. On a prima facie view, this was not a case of captive consumption by the manufacturer itself. The job worker did not further consume the goods in its own manufacturing activity, and the conversion charges already reflected the job worker's profit. In these circumstances, the applicability of Rule 8 was not made out at the interim stage, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on the same valuation question.
Conclusion: Rule 8 was held to have no prima facie application, and the appellant was granted partial waiver of pre-deposit on condition of depositing Rs. 10,50,000, with recovery stayed for the balance during pendency of the appeal.