Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of unusable polyester yarn was taxable as a waste product under Entry 32 of Notification No. ST-II-5785/X-10(1)-80-U.P. Act XV/48-Order-81 dated 7.9.1981, as amended, or under Entry 55 of the same notification.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the assessee's own case that the goods were unusable and were sold as waste product. The distinction between the burden of proof and the shifting onus was noted: while the initial burden in proceedings under Section 21 lay on the Revenue, once the assessee admitted the goods were not being sold as yarn but as waste product, the onus shifted to the assessee to show that a lower-rate entry applied. In that factual setting, the goods were found to fall within Entry 32 rather than Entry 55.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.