1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court upholds denial of tax exemption to hospital under Kerala Building Tax Act, emphasizing actual charitable use over stated objectives.</h1> The court upheld the government's decision to deny tax exemption under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 to a hospital owned by a private limited company. ... Charitable Purpose, Kerala Building Tax Act Issues:1. Interpretation of exemption under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 for buildings used for charitable purposes.2. Determination of whether the building in question qualifies for exemption under the Act based on the company's memorandum of association and annual reports.Analysis:The petitioner, as the Administrator of a hospital owned by a private limited company, sought exemption from the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975. The dispute arose from the government's decision to deny the exemption, leading to a legal challenge against the order (exhibit P-7). The petitioner argued that the building qualifies for exemption under section 3(1)(b) of the Act, which pertains to buildings used for charitable purposes. The company's memorandum of association, specifically clauses related to charitable activities, was central to the argument. The government's decision was based on the company's primary objective of running hospitals for profit rather than charity, as evidenced by financial data from annual reports. The court emphasized the distinction between the company's powers and its real charitable objectives, citing relevant legal principles on the interpretation of company objectives. The judgment highlighted the need for the building to be primarily used for charitable purposes to qualify for exemption under the Act. Ultimately, the court upheld the government's decision, ruling that the petitioner was not eligible for tax exemption. The petition was dismissed, affirming the decision in exhibit P-7.