Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court ruling favors assessee on deductions for benevolent funds & development fees. Revenue wins on scrap sales exclusion. Appeal disposed.</h1> <h3>THE COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s MOTOR INDUSTRIES CO LTD</h3> THE COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s MOTOR INDUSTRIES CO LTD - TMI Issues:1. Deduction for contribution to benevolent funds2. Exclusion of scrap sales from turnover for deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80HHE3. Treatment of development fee for deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80HHEAnalysis:Issue 1: Deduction for contribution to benevolent fundsThe appeal questioned whether the assessee could claim a deduction for contributions to benevolent funds without demonstrating compulsion under the law. The Court referred to a previous judgment where a similar question was answered in favor of the assessee. As the revenue did not dispute this, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee based on the previous judgment.Issue 2: Exclusion of scrap sales from turnoverRegarding the exclusion of scrap sales from turnover for calculating deductions under Sections 80HHC and 80HHE, the Court relied on a previous judgment where a similar question was answered in favor of the revenue. As both parties did not contest this, the Court ruled in favor of the revenue based on the previous judgment.Issue 3: Treatment of development feeThe question of whether a 90% development fee should be deducted from business profits for computing deductions under Sections 80HHC and 80HHE was raised. A previous judgment answered this question in favor of the assessee. As the revenue did not challenge this, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee based on the previous judgment.In conclusion, the Court disposed of the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the deduction for contributions to benevolent funds and the treatment of development fees, and in favor of the revenue on the exclusion of scrap sales from turnover. No costs were awarded in this judgment.