Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund under Notification No. 41/07 in respect of the exported services when service tax had been paid and the prescribed conditions were complied with.
Analysis: The claim was considered in the light of the CBEC circular clarifying that the relevant inquiries are whether service tax was paid, whether the services were actually availed, and whether the services satisfy the conditions for refund under Notification No. 41/07. The facts showed that the appellant had availed the services, paid the service tax, and complied with the notification conditions. On that basis, the refund claim could not be denied merely on the objection taken in the impugned order.
Conclusion: The refund was admissible and the appellant was entitled to the claim.