1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Dismissal of Rectification Application for Excessive Credit Claims; Inadvertent Error Standard Not Met</h1> The rectification application was dismissed as the excess credit claimed was not deemed inadvertent, having occurred 62 times. - TMI Rectification of mistake - Excess availment of credit has happened due to an act of inadvertence by the excise clerk - Held that:- applicants have taken excess credit 62 times during the period in dispute. In view of this it cannot be said that it is an inadvertent mistake on the part of the excise clerk - Rectification denied. The applicant filed for rectification of a mistake in the final order, claiming excess credit due to inadvertence by the excise clerk. However, since excess credit was taken 62 times, it was not considered inadvertent. The rectification application was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
