Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was required to obtain permission from the Ministry of Agriculture for import of boric acid for non-insecticidal use under the DFIA scheme and whether denial of the duty-free benefit under Notification No. 2(RE-2006)/2004-2009 was sustainable.
Analysis: The goods were imported for non-insecticidal purpose. Section 38 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 was relied upon to show that such imports were exempt from the permission requirement. The condition in Notification No. 2(RE-2006)/2004-2009 requiring such permission had already been struck down, and therefore the insistence on a Ministry of Agriculture permission could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The importer was not required to obtain the disputed permission and was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 2(RE-2006)/2004-2009 and the DFIA scheme; the impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.