TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Property sale confirmation: No income-tax clearance needed for confirming party. Transfer of Property Act prevails.</h1> The court held that the confirming party in a property sale did not need an income-tax clearance certificate as they did not possess any property ... Income Tax Clearence Certificate, Provisions For Clearence Certificate Issues Involved:1. Requirement of income-tax clearance certificate under section 230A of the Income-tax Act for a confirming party in a sale of property.2. Interpretation of 'interest in land' under section 2(6) of the Indian Registration Act.3. Applicability of section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act to the case.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Requirement of Income-Tax Clearance Certificate:The primary issue in this case was whether respondent No. 3, a confirming party in the sale of property, was required to produce an income-tax clearance certificate under section 230A of the Income-tax Act before the registration of the sale deed. The Registrar of Assurances, Calcutta, argued that respondent No. 3 had acquired an interest in the property through the agreement for sale and thus needed the clearance certificate. However, the court held that respondent No. 3, as a confirming party, did not have any right, title, or interest in the property that required such a certificate. The court emphasized that the purpose of section 230A is to prevent tax evasion by ensuring that property transfers do not occur without settling existing tax liabilities. Since respondent No. 3 was not transferring any property interest, the requirement for an income-tax clearance certificate did not apply.2. Interpretation of 'Interest in Land':The Registrar of Assurances relied on the definition of 'immovable property' in section 2(6) of the Indian Registration Act, which includes 'any other benefit to arise out of land.' The court clarified that this definition must be read in conjunction with section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, which states that a contract for the sale of immovable property does not create any interest or charge on the property. The court rejected the Registrar's interpretation that the agreement for sale created an interest in favor of respondent No. 3, noting that the Indian law does not recognize the English doctrine of equitable estate. The court held that the confirming party did not acquire any interest akin to rights to ways, lights, ferries, fisheries, or any other benefit arising out of the land.3. Applicability of Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act:Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act defines a sale as a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price and clarifies that a contract for sale does not itself create any interest in the property. The court reiterated that the Transfer of Property Act overrides other Acts regarding the creation of property interests. The court concluded that the Registrar of Assurances misinterpreted the law by assuming that the agreement for sale created an interest in the property for respondent No. 3. The court emphasized that respondent No. 3, as a confirming party, had no saleable interest in the property and thus was not required to obtain an income-tax clearance certificate.Conclusion:The court set aside the decision of the Registrar of Assurances, Calcutta, and directed the immediate registration of the deed of conveyance without requiring an income-tax clearance certificate from respondent No. 3. The writ petition succeeded, and there was no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
