Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as a small scale industrial undertaking despite the Assessing Officer's view that the investment in plant and machinery exceeded the prescribed limit.
Analysis: The assessee had provisional SSI registration prior to the relevant cut-off date and the investment in plant and machinery had to be tested in the light of the applicable governmental clarification and the statutory limit under Section 11B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The computation placed on record, after applying the notified exclusions for certain items, showed eligible plant and machinery investment within the permissible limit. The continued SSI registration and the factual position accepted by the revenue authorities supported the assessee's entitlement.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB and the disallowance was rightly deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an industrial unit retains SSI status and the eligible investment in plant and machinery, computed in accordance with the applicable notification and statutory criteria, remains within the prescribed limit, deduction under Section 80IB cannot be denied on a higher gross figure alone.