Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of the balance pre-deposit in an appeal involving valuation of a composite works contract and applicability of the composition option under the service tax valuation rules.
Analysis: The record indicated that the appellant had paid VAT on materials used in civil construction and had already discharged service tax at 4% under the composition route for the civil works component. The Revenue contended that the contracts were composite contracts involving design, supply, erection, commissioning and installation, and that bifurcation of such contracts was not permissible under the applicable rules. On a prima facie view, the Tribunal found force in the Revenue's objection to the claimed option under Rule 3(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2007, but also noted that tax had already been paid at 4% in terms of the same rule.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to deposit 20% of the tax demanded in both appeals, and on such deposit the balance demand, including interest and penalties, was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeals.