Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the hydraulic jack supplied with power transformers as an input used in relation to manufacture.
Analysis: The hydraulic jack was found to be supplied with each transformer and to be used for lifting the transformer tank for movement on rails during oil changing in the event of a fault. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had relied on the Larger Bench decision in Bajaj Auto Ltd., which had allowed credit on kits. The contrary decision in Daewoo Motors India Ltd. was distinguished on the basis that it dealt with inclusion of tool kits in assessable value and not with the credit issue in the present facts. The item was treated as an essential component supplied along with the transformers, and the Larger Bench ruling was held to govern the dispute.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the hydraulic jack was held admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.