TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay of seven days in filing the cross-objection deserved condonation. (ii) Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeals.
Issue (i): Whether the delay of seven days in filing the cross-objection deserved condonation.
Analysis: The delay was explained to the satisfaction of the Tribunal, and the explanation was accepted as sufficient cause for filing the cross-objection belatedly.
Conclusion: The delay in filing the cross-objection was condoned.
Issue (ii): Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeals.
Analysis: The dispute on CENVAT credit was stated to be squarely covered by earlier Tribunal decisions. On that basis, the Tribunal found that a strong prima facie case existed for full waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, and for protection against recovery till the appeals were heard finally.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeals.
Final Conclusion: The order grants interim relief to the appellant by condoning the procedural delay and protecting it from pre-deposit and recovery pending final hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the issue is already covered by prior Tribunal decisions, a strong prima facie case may justify complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal; procedural delay may be condoned on sufficient cause.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
