TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Appeals Decisions on Various Assessment Years with Focus on Expenditure, Capital Gains, and Cash Credits</h1> <h3>K. Venkateswara Reddy Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> K. Venkateswara Reddy Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax - TMI Issues involved:1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal for AY 2004-05.2. Addition of expenditure on construction of compound wall and domestic expenses for AY 2004-05.3. Addition of advance against sale of shop and agricultural land for AY 2005-06.4. Addition of unexplained cash credit and expenditure for AY 2006-07.5. Addition of interest receipts and capital interest for AY 2007-08 and AY 2008-09.Analysis:1. Condonation of Delay (AY 2004-05):The Assessee filed a petition for condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to reasonable cause, which was accepted by the ITAT. The delay was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.2. Expenditure Addition (AY 2004-05):The Assessee claimed expenditure on a compound wall without providing evidence. The AO made the addition, which was confirmed by CIT(A). ITAT upheld the decision, directing the AO to adjust the amount in capital gain computation separately.3. Advance Addition (AY 2005-06):An addition was made against an advance for the sale of shop and land. ITAT directed the AO to conduct further inquiries and consider the investment made in the partnership firm, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.4. Unexplained Cash Credit (AY 2006-07):The AO treated an amount as unexplained cash credit, which was contested by the Assessee. ITAT restored the issue to the AO for detailed examination, similar to the decision in AY 2005-06, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.5. Interest Receipts (AY 2007-08 & AY 2008-09):The AO added interest receipts not offered for taxation by the Assessee. ITAT considered the partnership firm's treatment of interest paid to partners and directed the AO to tax only the amount allowed in the firm's case, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the appeals for various assessment years were partly allowed or allowed for statistical purposes based on the specific issues and directions provided by the ITAT. The judgments were pronounced on 1st January 2014.
TaxTMI 