Tariff classification of TMT bars turns on Chapter Note thresholds, while Chapter 72 exemption remained available under the notification.

For TMT bars under Chapter 72, tariff classification is governed by the express Chapter Note 1(f), which defines other alloy steel by specified element thresholds. Because the imported goods were found to contain vanadium at 0.1% or more, they fell within other alloy steel under CTH 72.28, and BIS standard IS 7598:1990 could not override the tariff note. The notification issue turned on Serial No. 202A of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, which covered goods of Chapter 72 and provided countervailing duty relief; on that basis, the exemption was available. The classification challenge failed, but the exemption claim was accepted.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the imported TMT bars were correctly classified as other alloy steel under Chapter 72 of the Customs Tariff Act, or as non-alloy steel on the basis of BIS standard IS 7598:1990; and (ii) whether the appellant was entitled to countervailing duty exemption under Serial No. 202A of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002.

Issue (i): whether the imported TMT bars were correctly classified as other alloy steel under Chapter 72 of the Customs Tariff Act, or as non-alloy steel on the basis of BIS standard IS 7598:1990.

Analysis: The relevant test for classification was the specific Chapter Note 1(f) to Chapter 72, which defines other alloy steel by reference to prescribed percentage thresholds of specified elements. The imported goods were found, on the Revenue's test, to contain vanadium at 0.1% or more, which satisfied the chapter note threshold. The BIS standard could not override the express tariff classification note, and the reliance on taking the lowest value from a range was inapposite because the present case did not involve multiple test results from a uniform lot.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable as other alloy steel under CTH 72.28, and the classification challenge failed.

Issue (ii): whether the appellant was entitled to countervailing duty exemption under Serial No. 202A of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002.

Analysis: Serial No. 202A grants exemption to all goods of Chapter 72, and the notification scheme separately provided exemption from basic customs duty and countervailing duty. The denial of the benefit on the basis of the reasoning adopted by the lower authority was not sustainable on the facts of the case.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to countervailing duty exemption under Serial No. 202A of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only on the customs duty exemption issue, while the classification under Chapter 72.28 was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the express chapter note prevails over BIS standards, and exemption under a notification must be granted where the goods fall within the notified chapter coverage.

---