TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Penalties Imposed on Jaquar & Co. Ltd. for Duty Violations</h1> <h3>Jaquar & Co. Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-I</h3> Jaquar & Co. Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-I - TMI Issues:1. Duty confirmation, interest, and penalty imposition for Unit No.1 of M/s. Jaquar & Co. Ltd.2. Recovery of cenvat credit of service tax for Unit No.2 of M/s. Jaquar & Co. Ltd.3. Discrepancies in assessable values and cash discounts leading to short payment of duty.4. Admissibility of cash discounts, validity of debit notes, and utilization of service tax credit.Analysis:1. The judgment addressed duty confirmation, interest, and penalty imposition for Unit No.1 of M/s. Jaquar & Co. Ltd. The Commissioner confirmed duty amounting to Rs.2,63,87,854/- along with interest and imposed a penalty of the same amount for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. Additionally, a penalty of Rs.10 lakhs was imposed on the Director of Unit No.1. The discrepancies in assessable values from commercial invoices and ER-1 returns led to the short payment of duty, requiring the submission of reconciliation, which revealed intentional misrepresentation to claim excess amounts, along with discrepancies in cash discount values.2. Regarding Unit No.2 of M/s. Jaquar & Co. Ltd., the judgment focused on the recovery of cenvat credit of service tax. The company availed and utilized cenvat credit of service tax on invalid documents, leading to the clearance of excisable goods without payment of duty. The utilization of service tax credit on sales commission, deemed as a post-manufacturing activity, was also questioned for its admissibility.3. The analysis delved into discrepancies in assessable values and cash discounts, highlighting the short payment of duty. The appellant claimed cash discounts in invoices but charged the full amount in commercial invoices, leading to a clear short levy. The issue of reconciling differential values found in trial balances, including availed cash discounts, lacked supporting evidence. The judgment emphasized that the value of availed cash discounts cannot be included in the computation of total sales value, as per valuation provisions.4. The judgment scrutinized the admissibility of cash discounts, validity of debit notes, and utilization of service tax credit. The lack of evidence supporting the appellant's claim regarding cash discounts raised doubts, favoring the Revenue's stance. Consequently, the appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a stipulated period, with waivers and stays on recovery subject to compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
