1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT rules reconditioning not repair-cum-maintenance. Appellant's pre-deposit waived, stay granted.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that reconditioning should not be treated as repair-cum-maintenance for ... Appellant contended that reconditioning was included in ‘Management, maintenance or repair service’ with effect from 2005 and demand is for earlier period – Appellant having strong prima facie case on merits – pre-deposit of service tax waived The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi heard both sides and perused the record. The impugned order imposed service tax by treating reconditioning as repair-cum-maintenance. The appellant argued that reconditioning was included only from 2005, not for the earlier period. The appellant had already deposited Rs. 60,000 out of the demand of about Rs. 2.30 lakhs. The definition of service during the relevant period did not treat reconditioning as repair cum maintenance. The appellant had a strong prima facie case on merits. Further pre-deposit requirement was waived, and the stay application was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
