Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the services of technical testing and analysis, involving testing in India and transmission of the report abroad, could be treated prima facie as export of service so as to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The service fell within the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The relevant conditions were that the service should be performed partly outside India and that consideration should be received in foreign convertible currency. There was no dispute about receipt of consideration in foreign convertible currency. On the facts, the testing and analysis were carried out in India, but the service was completed only when the test report was sent and received by the overseas recipient. The reasoning adopted in the earlier tribunal decision relied upon was followed, and the service was treated as one performed partly in India and partly outside India. This established a strong prima facie case that the activity amounted to export of service.
Conclusion: The appellant succeeded in establishing a prima facie case for treating the service as export of service, and complete waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal was granted.