TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT NEW DELHI Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Lack of Authorizing Committee Members</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore (MP.) Versus Ambika Refinery</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals due to the lack of multiple members on the authorizing Committee. Shri Arvind ... Authority to file appeal - One person holding charge of 2 Commissionerate - Held that:- Committee which authorize the appeal to be filed was one man Committee and Shri Arvind Singh who has holding the charge of Commissionerate, Bhopal and Indore Commissionerate was signatory to the authorization. The word ‘Committee’ always implies more than one Member to take a decision. Even if one person holds charge of 2 Commissionerate he does not become 2 Members to form the Committee. Accordingly, the decision of the Committee has not yet seen the light of the day not comprising two Members therein - Decided against Revenue. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals as the Committee authorizing the appeal had only one member, which does not fulfill the requirement of having multiple members to make a decision. Shri Arvind Singh, holding charge of two Commissionerates, was the sole signatory to the authorization, which was deemed insufficient.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
