CESTAT NEW DELHI Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Lack of Authorizing Committee Members The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals due to the lack of multiple members on the authorizing Committee. Shri Arvind ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT NEW DELHI Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Lack of Authorizing Committee Members
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals due to the lack of multiple members on the authorizing Committee. Shri Arvind Singh, the sole signatory holding charge of two Commissionerates, was found inadequate for authorization.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals as the Committee authorizing the appeal had only one member, which does not fulfill the requirement of having multiple members to make a decision. Shri Arvind Singh, holding charge of two Commissionerates, was the sole signatory to the authorization, which was deemed insufficient.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.