Cutchi Memons Act displaces Hindu coparcenary incidents, preserving only pre-commencement rights under the saving clause.

The Mysore Cutchi Memons Act I of 1943 was construed as replacing Hindu law incidents of coparcenary for Cutchi Memons in matters of succession and inheritance, including right by birth and survivorship. Section 2 was read broadly to displace the Hindu law position in joint family property, while section 3 was treated as preserving only rights crystallised on the Act's commencement through a notional partition. On that basis, no post-Act birthright arose in favour of the assessee's sons, and the property and income were treated as the assessee's separate property and income.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Mysore Cutchi Memons Act I of 1943 governed Cutchi Memons in matters of joint family property, survivorship and a son's right by birth; (ii) whether section 2 of the Act displaced the Hindu law incidents of joint family property and survivorship; (iii) whether section 3 of the Act saved the assessee's rights and liabilities in the property; and (iv) whether the property and income were joint family property or the separate property and income of the assessee.

Issue (i): Whether the Mysore Cutchi Memons Act I of 1943 governed Cutchi Memons in matters of joint family property, survivorship and a son's right by birth.

Analysis: The expression used in the Act, read with its object and preamble, was construed broadly. The Court held that "succession and inheritance" were not confined to devolution of separate property on death, but included the Hindu law incidents of coparcenary, including right by birth and survivorship. The earlier Supreme Court decision was treated as consistent with that understanding.

Conclusion: The Act governed those matters and displaced the contrary Hindu law position.

Issue (ii): Whether section 2 of the Act displaced the Hindu law incidents of joint family property and survivorship.

Analysis: Section 2 was held to have substituted Muhammadan law for Hindu law in matters of succession and inheritance. The Court rejected a narrow construction based on a distinction between succession and survivorship, holding that such a restricted meaning would defeat the legislative purpose and produce anomalous results.

Conclusion: Section 2 affected joint family property, survivorship and the right by birth.

Issue (iii): Whether section 3 of the Act saved the assessee's rights and liabilities in the property.

Analysis: The Court held that a notional partition had to be assumed on the commencement of the Act for determining the rights preserved by section 3. Only the right crystallised on that date was saved. As the assessee was unmarried on the relevant date, he could not be treated as constituting a Hindu undivided family thereafter, and no further right by birth could arise in favour of his sons after the Act came into force.

Conclusion: Section 3 did not save the rights claimed by the assessee's sons, and it preserved only the limited pre-existing right of the assessee.

Issue (iv): Whether the property and income were joint family property or the separate property and income of the assessee.

Analysis: Since the joint family incident had been displaced by the Act and no surviving coparcenary right remained after commencement except to the extent saved, the property thereafter stood in the assessee's hands as individual property. The assessable income followed the same character.

Conclusion: The property and income were separate property and income of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee: the Act displaced the Hindu law incidents of coparcenary for Cutchi Memons, section 3 saved only limited pre-commencement rights, and the assessee was taxable as an individual in respect of the property and income in question.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute governing "succession and inheritance" is enacted to replace customary law for a community, the expression may include Hindu law incidents of coparcenary, right by birth and survivorship, and a saving clause preserves only rights crystallised before commencement.

---