Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was competent against the levy of interest under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the assessee had disputed part of the assessed income.
Analysis: The assessment was completed under section 143(3) and the assessee succeeded before the appellate authority in getting a substantial addition deleted, while the levy of interest under section 139(1) was left undisturbed on the view that no appeal lay against interest alone. The governing principle was that an appeal is maintainable where the assessee challenges, disputes, or denies liability to be assessed to some extent, because success on that contention would reduce the consequential interest charged; a mere challenge to the quantum of interest by itself is not enough.
Conclusion: The appeal against the levy of interest under section 139(1) was competent. The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.