Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to the benefit of paragraph 1.5 of Chapter 1A of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-09 so as to avoid confiscation, redemption fine and penalty for import of sandalwood without licence.
Analysis: The relevant documents showed that the proforma invoice and remittance were made on 30.03.2006, before the restriction on import of sandalwood was introduced by the policy circular dated 07.04.2006. The later customs invoice, bill of lading, phytosanitary certificate and exporter's confirmation supported the existence of a concluded commercial arrangement that had crystallised before the policy change. Paragraph 1.5 of Chapter 1A of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-09 protected imports that had been firmly committed before the restriction came into force, and the absence of an irrevocable letter of credit was not decisive where the transaction was otherwise established to have been concluded earlier.
Conclusion: The importer was entitled to the benefit of the policy saving provision, and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were unsustainable.