Prima facie breach of exemption conditions supported waiver of pre-deposit, stay of recovery, and continued use of the imported rig.

An eight-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the explanation was found satisfactory and no prejudice was shown. On the request for interim relief, the Tribunal held that the appellant had shown a plausible prima facie case on whether use of the imported rig for test borings after overhaul and servicing breached the exemption condition in Notification No. 21/2002. Pre-deposit was waived, recovery of duty and penalty was stayed during the appeal, and continued use of the rig was allowed subject to keeping the existing bank guarantee alive as security for the revenue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the delay of eight days in filing the appeal should be condoned. (ii) Whether a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit and grant of stay pending appeal, and whether the imported rig could be used during the pendency of the appeal on the strength of bank guarantee.

Issue (i): Whether the delay of eight days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Analysis: The delay was supported by grounds found satisfactory, and no prejudice was shown to result from the short delay in presentation of the appeal.

Conclusion: The delay was condoned.

Issue (ii): Whether a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit and grant of stay pending appeal, and whether the imported rig could be used during the pendency of the appeal on the strength of bank guarantee.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether use of the imported rig for test borings after overhaul and servicing amounted to violation of the condition in Notification No. 21/2002. On the materials then before it, the Tribunal found the appellant's explanation plausible, held that detailed examination was still required, and treated the case as one warranting interim protection. The existing bank guarantee was considered sufficient to secure the revenue while the appeal remained pending.

Conclusion: Pre-deposit was waived, recovery of duty and penalty was stayed during the appeal, and use of the rig was permitted subject to keeping the bank guarantee alive.

Final Conclusion: The appellant obtained interim relief in the appeal, including waiver of pre-deposit, protection against recovery, and permission to retain use of the rig pending final adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the appellant discloses a plausible prima facie case on the alleged breach of exemption conditions, interim waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery may be granted, with adequate security protecting the revenue.

---