High Court allows appeal without pre-deposit on duty recovery, sets interim stay on coercive recovery.

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing pre-deposit for an appeal on duty recovery and confiscation. The Court found the appellant's prior payment of a substantial amount of the duty sufficient, allowing the appeal to proceed without additional deposit. Additionally, the Court clarified that no pre-deposit was necessary for the redemption fine. The Tribunal was instructed to hear and decide the appeal promptly, with an interim stay on coercive recovery until final resolution by a specified date.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding pre-deposit for appeal on merits.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) directing pre-deposit of a sum for entertaining the appeal. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing air conditioner assemblies, imported goods classified differently by the department. The Commissioner of Customs held a misdeclaration and misclassification, ordering duty recovery and confiscation. The Tribunal initially directed pre-deposit against the duty, later modifying the amount. The High Court noted the appellant had already paid a substantial amount of the duty demanded and found it sufficient for entertaining the appeal. The Court also addressed the issue of redemption fine, holding that no pre-deposit was required for it. The Court directed the Tribunal to hear and decide the appeal without further deposit, with interim stay against coercive recovery until final disposal, emphasizing expeditious resolution by a specified date.

---