Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported drug, marked as feed grade and not for medicinal or human use, was entitled to exemption from the import restriction and could be cleared without obtaining a Drugs Controller NOC, and whether the confiscation and consequential penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: Section 10 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 prohibits import of drugs whose import is restricted under the Rules. Rule 43 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, read with Schedule D, carves out an exemption for substances not intended for medical use, subject to the prescribed declaration or labelling requirements. The imported consignments bore a clear marking that they were feed grade and not for medicinal or human use, and this factual position was not disputed. The exemption was therefore attracted, provided the end use remained non-medicinal, and the goods were not shown to fall outside the exempted category. The reasoning of the Madras High Court on the same exemption framework was followed.
Conclusion: The import was held to be covered by the exemption under Rule 43 read with Schedule D, the confiscation and penalty were unsustainable, and release of the goods was directed on an undertaking that the end use would not be for medicinal or human use.