1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants waiver of service tax pre-deposit based on CENVAT credit entitlement</h1> The Tribunal granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalty amounting to &8377;34,37,403/-, based on the ... Denial cenvat credit of Service tax paid on warehousing outside India under reverse charge - Waiver of Pre-deposit β Held that:- As per the Boardβs Circular dated 27-6-2008, credit cannot be denied - Prima facie the applicants are entitled to CENVAT credit on services tax β Pre-deposits waived till the disposal β Stay granted. Issues:Application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax based on CENVAT credit denial.Analysis:The case involved an application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax amounting to &8377;34,37,403/-, interest, and penalty. The demand was contested on the grounds that the applicants were denied CENVAT credit on service tax paid for warehousing services outside India for goods sold abroad, citing Section 66A of the Finance Act. The applicant relied on a Board Circular dated 27-6-2008 to support their claim, which clarified the treatment of service tax paid under Section 66A as 'input credit' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, if the services were used as input services by the manufacturer or provider of output taxable service. The Tribunal found that based on the circular, the applicants were prima facie entitled to the CENVAT credit on the service tax paid. Consequently, the pre-deposit of dues was waived, and the recovery was stayed during the appeal process. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, indicating a favorable decision for the applicant. The judgment was pronounced in open court, providing a clear resolution to the issue at hand.