Limited rectification powers cannot be used to review or recall an order on the merits in tax proceedings.

Rectification jurisdiction under section 254(2) is limited to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used to review, recall, or rehear an earlier order on the merits. A direction to the Assessing Officer to re-examine the assessee's deduction claim under section 80IB(10) after considering further material was treated as a conscious adjudicatory decision, not an accidental error open to reopening in miscellaneous proceedings. The Tribunal reiterated that statutory review is unavailable unless expressly conferred, and that dissatisfaction with the earlier reasoning cannot be converted into a rectification application. The rectification application was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could, in rectification proceedings under section 254(2), recall or re-examine its earlier order on the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The rectification jurisdiction under section 254(2) is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record. It does not authorise the Tribunal to review its own order, recall it in entirety, or permit a rehearing on the merits. An order directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the claim on the basis of further material and proper opportunity was treated as a conscious adjudicatory decision, and any grievance against that finding could not be reopened through a miscellaneous application. The Tribunal also reiterated that statutory review is unavailable unless expressly conferred, and that the limited power of rectification cannot be used to reargue the whole matter.

Conclusion: The rectification application was not maintainable and was dismissed.

---