Tribunal waives pre-deposit for disputed cenvat credit, pending appeal. Invoice delay key issue.

The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit for disputed cenvat credit, staying the collection of dues pending appeal. Issues included delayed invoice issuance, lack of payment proof, and use of inter office memos instead of actual invoices. The applicant argued that taxes were eventually paid, focusing on invoice delay. The Tribunal found no significant revenue loss from inter office memos and deferred procedural matters to the appeal hearing. Procedural and jurisdictional concerns were to be addressed during the appeal process.

---

---

Issues:
Request for waiver of predeposit of cenvat credit denied on various grounds including delayed issuance of invoices, lack of proof of payment, use of inter office memos instead of actual invoices, and non-payment of service tax for cell phone services.

Analysis:
1. The denial of cenvat credit was based on several grounds, such as the service provider not issuing invoices within the prescribed time frame, lack of evidence of payment by specific entities, and the use of inter office memos instead of actual invoices. The impugned order highlighted these issues, particularly emphasizing the delay in invoice issuance as a major concern. The question of whether the Revenue had concrete evidence to challenge the payments by the service provider was raised, indicating a potential lack of clarity in the case.

2. The applicant's counsel argued that construction companies eventually paid the tax, albeit belatedly. The focus was on the delay in raising invoices rather than non-payment of tax. The order suggested that any discrepancies regarding the office where credit was taken or procedural matters could be addressed during the appeal hearing. Consequently, the Tribunal found it appropriate to grant a waiver of pre-deposit for the disputed amount and imposed a stay on the collection of dues pending the appeal process.

3. Regarding credit based on inter office debit memos, the applicant provided copies of invoices received by the Executive Engineer of BSNL Salem to support the issuance of such memos. It was also clarified that the equipment in question was utilized for specific services provided by the Salem office. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments presented by the Revenue, did not identify any significant revenue loss and deemed the procedural issues raised as matters to be addressed during the appeal proceedings.

In conclusion, the Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit for the disputed cenvat credit amount and ordered a stay on the collection of dues during the pendency of the appeal, emphasizing that procedural and jurisdictional concerns could be examined in detail at the appeal hearing.

---