Revenue appeal partially allowed for eviction expenditure & capital gain addition. CIT(A) directs reassessment without section 50.

The appeal of the Revenue was partially allowed for statistical purposes in the case involving the disallowance of expenditure claimed for eviction of premises under section 48(1) and the addition of short term capital gain on depreciable assets. The CIT(A) overturned the disallowance of the claimed expenditure, deeming it genuine and not disputed, and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the treatment of the amount. Additionally, the CIT(A) deleted the addition of short term capital gain on depreciable assets, instructing a reevaluation without applying section 50 and allowing the deduction of the amount paid to the tenants. The case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further review based on the evidence presented.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of expenditure claimed for eviction of premises under section 48(1).
2. Addition of short term capital gain on depreciable asset.

Issue 1 - Disallowance of Expenditure for Eviction of Premises:
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order passed by the CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of Rs. 9,92,000 claimed as expenditure for eviction of premises under section 48(1) for the assessment year 2004-05. The Assessing Officer added back the amount to the total income of the assessee, citing that the claim of compensation was a transaction within the family. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction after examining the evidence, stating that the payment was genuine and not disputed. The CIT(A) found that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was based on presumption and surmises, hence deleting the disallowance.

Issue 2 - Addition of Short Term Capital Gain on Depreciable Asset:
The Assessing Officer added Rs. 10,08,000 as short term capital gain on depreciable assets, rejecting the claim of long term capital loss by the assessee. The CIT(A) deleted this addition after considering the facts that the shops were vacated by paying Rs. 9,92,000 to the tenants and that no depreciation was claimed on these shops in the previous years. The CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the matter, not apply section 50, and allow the deduction of Rs. 9,92,000 paid to the tenants while computing capital gains. The matter was restored back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of the evidence presented.

In conclusion, the appeal of the Revenue was allowed in part for statistical purposes, and the case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation regarding the treatment of the claimed expenditure for eviction of premises and the calculation of capital gains on the sale of depreciable assets.

---