Interest on cess refunds and self re-credit under excise notification could not be pursued before quantification of the amount.

Interest on delayed reversal of cess and education cess was treated as outside Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, because such levies were not regarded as duty of excise. Under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, self re-credit was permitted subject to reversal within five days of intimation by the Assistant Commissioner. However, the stay application seeking waiver of pre-deposit could not be entertained because the interest amount had not yet been quantified. The application was therefore dismissed at that stage, with liberty to move a fresh application after quantification.

---

---

Issues: Whether the stay application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of interest on the refund of cess and education cess was maintainable when the interest amount had not yet been quantified, and whether Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to cess and education cess.

Analysis: The appellant was operating under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, which permitted self re-credit subject to the prescribed reversal procedure within five days from intimation by the Assistant Commissioner. The reasoning accepted that cess and education cess were not duty of excise and, on that premise, Section 11B was not the proper provision for interest in relation to delayed reversal of such amounts. However, the record showed that the lower authority had not quantified the interest amount, and without such quantification the stay application could not be finally entertained.

Conclusion: The application was held to be not maintainable at that stage and was dismissed, with liberty to file a fresh application after quantification of interest.

---