Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellant directed to pre-deposit CENVAT credit balance, compliance deadline set</h1> <h3>M/s. Kavveri Telecom Products Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Bangalore</h3> M/s. Kavveri Telecom Products Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Bangalore - TMI Issues: Application for waiver and stay of adjudged dues including CENVAT credit denial and penalty.Analysis:The appellant filed an application seeking waiver and stay concerning the adjudged dues, which comprised CENVAT credit denial of Rs. 2,73,056/- and an equal penalty. The appellant reversed certain amounts in the CENVAT account, totaling Rs. 1,45,532/-. The appellant claimed a prima facie case for the balance CENVAT credit, contending that it was denied due to being taken on invalid documents. The counsel argued that the documents were sufficient for credit availment. However, it was found that Rs. 557/- of the credit was denied for being excess. The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case regarding the validity of documents for the remaining credit. The tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit the balance CENVAT credit within six weeks and report compliance by a specified date. If compliance is met, there will be a waiver and stay on interest and penalties related to the credit.This judgment highlights the importance of substantiating a prima facie case when contesting CENVAT credit denial based on document validity. The tribunal's decision underscores the necessity for compliance with pre-deposit requirements within the specified timeline to be eligible for waiver and stay on associated interest and penalties. It showcases the procedural aspects and evidentiary burden placed on appellants in such cases, emphasizing the need for meticulous documentation and legal argumentation to support their claims effectively.