TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Construction activities for specific entities not exempt from service tax; applicant liable. Predeposit ordered, waiver possible.</h1> <h3>M/s. URC Constructions (P) Ltd. Versus CCE (ST), Salem </h3> M/s. URC Constructions (P) Ltd. Versus CCE (ST), Salem - TMI Issues:1. Whether the construction activities undertaken by the applicant for certain entities were liable for service tax.2. Whether the entities for whom the constructions were done fall under the category of 'commercial or industrial construction.'3. Whether the applicant is required to pay service tax for the construction activities.Analysis:1. The applicant, engaged in construction activity, did not pay service tax for certain constructions for Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. and the Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) of the Department of Atomic Energy. A show-cause notice led to a demand of service tax of Rs.51,49,856/- along with interest and penalties. The appellant challenged this order.2. The appellant argued that constructions for commercial and industrial purposes are taxable under specific sections. They relied on CBEC clarifications stating that activities by the Government are not 'commercial or industrial construction.' Citing a previous case, Nagarjuna Constructions Co. Ltd. Vs. CCE 2010 (19) STR 259, the appellant contended that the impugned activity did not fall under the taxable categories.3. The Joint Commissioner (AR) opposed, stating Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. is not a government arm but a Public Limited Company. Referring to a Tribunal decision, he argued service tax must be paid for services to Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. For the Nuclear Fuel Complex, he highlighted it as an industrial unit of the Department of Atomic Energy, selling products commercially. He emphasized that the unit's activities were not sovereign functions of the Government, making it liable for service tax.4. The Tribunal noted the tax liability for services to Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. was minimal. Regarding the Nuclear Fuel Complex, the Board's Circular was considered. The Tribunal found the appellant's case not comparable to the manufacture of nuclear fuel for commercial sale. Thus, a predeposit of Rs.10,00,000/- was ordered within six weeks, with waiver and stay for the balance dues upon compliance by a specified date.This judgment clarified the tax liability for construction activities, interpreting relevant sections and applying precedents to determine the taxable nature of the services provided to different entities.
TaxTMI 