Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal affirms CIT(A)'s classification of assessee as charitable institution under section 2(15)</h1> <h3>Income-tax Officer(E) Versus Khar Gymkhana</h3> Income-tax Officer(E) Versus Khar Gymkhana - TMI Issues:1. Appeal against orders of CIT(A)-I, Mumbai for assessment years 2002-03 and 2005-06.2. Issue of treating the assessee as a charitable institution under section 2(15) of the Act.Analysis:1. The Appellate Tribunal, ITAT Mumbai, comprising J. Sudhakar Reddy and V. Durga Rao, JJ., heard appeals by the revenue against CIT(A)-I, Mumbai's orders for assessment years 2002-03 and 2005-06. As the appeals pertained to the same assessee and involved identical issues, they were consolidated for a common order.2. The main contention in both appeals was the CIT(A)'s decision to classify the assessee as a charitable institution falling under section 2(15) of the Act. During the hearing, both parties acknowledged that this issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee by the ITAT in the assessee's own case for earlier years 2001-02, 2003-04, and 2004-05. The Tribunal's decision in the AY 2001-02 case was particularly cited, where it was held that the assessee qualified as a public charitable trust based on previous assessments and grounds presented.3. Citing precedent and following the ITAT's decision in the assessee's previous case, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s classification of the assessee as a charitable institution under section 2(15) of the Act for the years under review. Consequently, the revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the orders of the CIT(A) were affirmed.4. The Tribunal, in its ruling dated November 25, 2011, pronounced the dismissal of both appeals by the revenue in an open court session. The decision was based on the consistent application of legal principles and precedents established in previous cases concerning the classification of the assessee as a charitable institution under the relevant provisions of the Act.